Infinite Monkeys

Another race speech? Oy...

Although Barack Obama is 99.99 percent certain to be the Democratic nominee for president, he faces some major challenges in the general election. Kurt Anderson elaborates on 10 biggies in New York Magazine this week. If I'm reading him right, Anderson, who is an Obama supporter, seems to be girding for a loss. As one commenter put it, "With supporters like you, who needs detractors?"

Well, with candidates like Obama, who needs Republican opposition researchers? Obama, who worked so diligently to frame himself as the "post-racial" candidate, is beset with race hustlers, black separatists and radicals.

Juan Williams argues in Friday's Wall Street Journal that Obama needs to tackle the race issue. Except Obama needs to be honest about it this time:

The heart of Mr. Obama's problem is that he risks being defined by Rev. Wright and Father Pfleger. Most American voters know him only as a fresh face with an Ivy League education, an outstanding credential – editor of the Harvard Law Review – an exciting speaker, and a man who stands for much-desired change. Beyond that he is a political mystery with a thin legislative record. But when voters look at his past for clues to the core of his character, they find religious leaders calling for God to damn America and concluding that America is the greatest sin against God.

To deal with this controversy effectively, Mr. Obama needs to give another speech. This time he has to admit to sins of using race for political expediency – by knowingly buying into divisive, mean messages being delivered from the pulpit. He has to say that, as a biracial young man with no community roots, attaching himself to Rev. Wright and the Trinity congregation was a shortcut to move up the ladder in the Chicago political scene. He has to call race-baiting what it is, whether it comes from a pulpit or calls itself progressive politics. And he has to challenge his supporters, especially his black base, to be honest about real problems at the heart of today's racial divide – including out-of-wedlock births, crime, drugs and a culture that devalues education while glorifying the gangster life.

Mr. Obama also has to raise the bar for how political criticism is handled in his camp. Step one is to acknowledge that not every critic is a racist. His very liberal record and his limited experience, like his association with Rev. Wright, is a fact, not the work of white racists. Just as he calls for the GOP not to engage in the politics of fear over terrorism, Mr. Obama needs to declare that he will refrain from playing the racial victim, because he understands such tactics will paralyze political debate and damage race relations.

Only by admitting to his own sins can Mr. Obama credibly claim that he has seen the promise of our country, in which Americans of all colors work together. Only then can he convince dubious white voters that he is ready to move beyond racial antagonism and be their president.

My prediction: Not gonna happen. Obama's experience and his choice of friends and "spiritual advisers" practically forecloses any such option. Also: Would most voters understand what Obama was trying to do? Or would Americans dismiss another race speech from Obama as an act of political opportunism? The question practically answers itself.