I didn't draw Mohammed today

I've got nothing against blasphemy -- in fact, I kind of love it.

I love "South Park," enjoyed "The Last Temptation of Christ" more as a novel than as a movie, think "Dogma" is overrated but enjoyable and, generally, like to see sacred cows nudged a little bit. I think it's wonderful, essential and necessary that we can do such poking in America -- and it pisses me off, frankly, when the "South Park" guys come under threat for depicting Mohammed. Or, looking abroad, when European cartoonists face violence, threats and censorship for doing the same.

Still, I didn't draw Mohammed today. And I won't be publishing any of the cartoons. At least, not for now.

Why? Simple. I have Muslim friends and acquaintances -- at least one of whom, I know, is very offended when Mohammed is drawn or otherwise depicted. Not to the point of threatening or undertaking violence, thank goodness, but still: It's an act that wounds her.

And that, I think, beyond strength in the face of censorship and threats, is part of "Draw Mohammed Day" is supposed to be about: Offense.

Some more hawkish and conservative types have pointed out -- rightly -- that Comedy Central, "South Park" and other American institutions have skewered Christianity for years without facing death threats. But I can't help but notice that many of the people who make that observation have also gotten the vapors -- or are closely allied with those who get the vapors -- about having their religious sensibilities trampled upon. And that many of those people are very, very gleeful about the chance to offend Muslims en masse today.

So yeah, there's a double standard. But I suspect the double standard goes both ways.

Me? I admittedly feel more comfortable blaspheming Christianity because, well, Christianity is mine to blaspheme: I grew up in it, was immersed in it and (yes) fell away from it. Even at a distance of nearly a decade, its rhythms and habits are still etched in my bones. And my own adventures in blasphemy were part of rebelling against a culture that had dominated my outlook and behavior.

But Mohammed was never my prophet. Between that and the fact of my friends' sensibilities, a day devoted to angering his followers seems ... rude. It seems too easy to me, even a little bullying, to blaspheme against somebody else's god.

And I'm weird: I've always felt my principles must be balanced and shaped by the impact that they have on real people. Right now, I don't think I have enough cause to hurt my friends.

Make no mistake: I still find the threats and censorship despicable. There may come a time when I feel that committing a little blasphemy against Islam's sacred cows is necessary. That day isn't today. I won't draw Mohammed.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://blog.infinitemonkeysblog.com/?q=trackback/7271

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I did. I drew him on a wall

I did.
I drew him on a wall over a bathroom stall.
He was eating a pork chop and petting his dog.

I agree with you

Wow!http//www.thehamiltonpost.blogspot.com

Re: Hamilton agrees with me!

It's a day that shall be celebrated as a holiday in my house, forthwith. Because I thought that would never, ever happen. ; )

I didn't draw Muhammad today, either...

...mostly because I've had better things to do. But I would remiss if I didn't repost these links:

Also, this:

And finally this:

It was draw Mo day?

Man, I am out of the loop. Sounds like a good idea. Of course it's rude - any blashemy is. But I think it also makes an important political point.

Next we need a "Molest the Pope Day." Say what you want about Islamists - at least they aren't pederasts, or harborers thereof.

Um

"Islamists - at least they aren't pederasts, or harborers thereof."

Not that we know of. Mostly we know our own best, and -- as with Joel, above -- we feel a right to skewer our own. This extends to lambasting the Roman Catholic Church for what is in all likelihood a major Crime Against Humanity. There's another chunk of evidence affirming that "power corrupts"...

Thus, I feel far more relaxed and able to laugh at South Park when they are skewering Jesus, as opposed to, say, Scientology or Islam.

I give South Park full marks for being truly "equal opportunity" skewerers. I think that is another reason I don't mind, apart from the fact that any blasphemy (if such is intended) isn't aimed at me but at God. He can take care of Himself.

Sidereally, I mention I find the Flanders family on The Simpsons very well-executed: Ned Flanders is a prime example of drawing a character so well that he can be seen as spoofing traditional Christians in one scene and upholding them in another -- sometimes simultaneously.

That said, I wouldn't be inclined to sketch Mohammed in any way because he's not mine to portray, or
misrepresent (blaspheme, if you will).

Still, the right to portray him exists in the USA -- it is part of the rules of the country. Christians, having been involved in creating this nation, are probably more used to the rules that the relative newcomers of Islam. Here's hoping the vast majority get used to it. Many already are.

As to "Molest the Pope" Day, well -- I can't support that. Not entirely. Perhaps "arrest the Pope," but there again, that is more literal than sketching Mohammed, or John Smith, etc.

But I know a couple of guys (Parker and Stone) who probably have a few ideas along those lines.

Islam and Pederasty

"Say what you want about Islamists - at least they aren't pederasts, or harborers thereof."

Actually, in pre-modern Islam, it was a widespread practice, often alluded to in art and literature up through the 17th century. While times have changed and it's perhaps not as pervasive today, it still appears to be practiced quite frequently in tribal areas of Afghanistan and other pre-dominantly muslim nations.

RE Islam and Pederasty

Ah... my mistake then. In that case, let's have a "Molest Mohammed Day" too.

I wonder though, if the pederasty/rape of children is relegated only to the imams, as it is with Catholics. Catholic lay people (nor nuns) do not rape children (any more so than non-Catholic lay people). But Catholic priests do, and their Church abets them. A couple of quick links from Google indicates that pederasty in the Muslim world is more widespread - i.e. more of a cultural than sectarian phenomenon - than it is in the Christian world. And that begs the question of whether one is worse than the other.

Khabalox, the Cultural Insensitivist

There you go again, Khab, putting down other cultures -- you non-relativist, you. Repeat to yourself, until you feel it: "peoples of all cultures are equally dignified, which means necessarily that all cultural standards and practices are morally equivalent."