InstaMonkey - Forum Edition: Garbage Monopoly Enforced in San Fran

I'm sure our libertarian Monkeys will be incensed (as I am) about this story of an entrepreneur being forcibly shut out of business by the government.

Here in San Francisco picking up a garbage costs about $37/can per week.

A contractor I know got fed up, canceled his service as did his neighbor. They simply loaded both houses garbage into his truck, took it to the dump and paid the $40 to get rid of it. He charged his friend $10.

As a contractor he had to go to the dump all the time anyway. Pretty soon he had a small business, neighbors paying him $10 instead of $37, a difference of over $1400 per year or the price of a vacation or plasma TV for the family.

[snip]

When the local garbage company and its union found out about "Joe" they complained to the city. Within a year a law was passed stating that garbage service was now mandatory for all residents at the price the city's monopoly charged, which was shortly raised. And Joe? For a while he still took our recyclables until he was fined $4000, even though he had our permission. It appears our household recyclables are owned by the Garbage company, not us, as it subsidizes our low cost of garbage service!

This story came to the blogger via an email, and I did some quick searching to try to corroborate it (or at least date it), but all I found were reposts of the original blog post. Does anyone have other info on this story? As I read it, it sounds like the government is forcing residents to participate in an economic transaction. Is this the norm in other cities?

Trackback URL for this post:

http://blog.infinitemonkeysblog.com/?q=trackback/7230

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Incense & Peppermint

Yeah, I'll side with you on this one, Khab. If it's true, it's just one more brick of insanity in the Wall that is San Francisco politics.

I'd say put 'em all on an island, but they already got one of those, and it isn't helping.

"There's a reason we don't quote Hitler when we discuss highway spending. It just puts too much noise into your signal." Joel, 2010

Sort of True

Not sure about San Francisco, but if you put "garbage monopoly" into Google you get some real-life cases. One of the first hits is from Washington State where 2008 the Supreme Court held that the garbage monopoly is constitutional because trash collection is a public function (like police and fire departments) which just so happens to be outsourced to a private company.

I do know that, here in New Jersey, as far as I can tell, trash on the curb, which used to be owned by no one, is now owned by the state or maybe local government. This change has been happening all over this great land of ours to prevent people from taking the recyclables and recycling them for money elsewhere -- because the state (or local) government wants that money for itself. Also, there's a problem with identity theft and whatnot.

I looked into this because I was banned from my local electronics recycling when I tried to take computer parts away with me. Electronics recycling is collected by a private company -- if by "collected" you mean there's a drop-off point conveniently rarely open off in the swamp next to the sewage processing plant -- and the spokesman for that private company told me I was stealing when I took computer parts. I argued the point and eventually he also claimed that any hard drives might contain personal information and so it was a privacy issue.

The company has since forgotten I was banned and I can drop stuff off again, but I'm afraid to try and take anything. Also, my wife is tired of old computer parts cluttering up the place.

crywalt recycling recycled parts technique follows:

use a trenchcoat

Trenchcoat

A trenchcoat would hardly replace my wife, now, would it?