Registered? Please log in below.
New? Please register.
Here are some reasons why.
I have a letter to the editor in the Wall Street Journal today, taking issue with Karl Rove's column last week on the merits of No Child Left Behind. Needless to say, I'm expecting an exploding "turd blossom" to be sitting on my doorstep any day now.
Comments
Well done
Nice job, Ben.
NCLB was emblematic of what was wrong with the domestic policy initiatives GWB pursued. He decided it was too hard to roll back federal power, so he tried to steer it to satisfy his goals. Rather than abolish the Department of Education (which we lived with quite well for about 200 years -- hell, kids were better educated before DOE was around), co-opt it.
Dumb, really dumb.
No Child Left Behind
... is one of those titles that is hard to argue against. I mean who but an ogre would want to leave a single little innocent behind? Even Standardized Testing sounds good on the surface as some sort of objective measure of comparison, etc. That it was an easy sale is best reflected by the congressional voting on the House Bill:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2001-145
as well as the Senate bill:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2001-192
This, being a very early piece of legislation following the bitter 2000 election, is likely best perceived as an olive branch for bipartisanship offered. Of course, it was shortsighted, and now that the unintended results are exposed, the crying game begins. From day one it was doomed to fall into the political pit it now finds itself. Less big government is always better than more big government. And this would have been even before learning that black children were right brained more than left brained. Who knew?