Steve Poizner poisons his campaign for California governor

Steve PoiznerSteve PoiznerCalifornia Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner always struck me a smart, level-headed guy. You don't make a fortune in Silicon Valley if you're a dummkopf. Of course, business smarts don't always translate into political smarts, as voters are learning to their chagrin today.

Poizner called a bizarre press conference in Sacramento on Monday, in which he accused former eBay CEO Meg Whitman -- his main rival for the Republican nomination for governor -- of "criminal" campaign tactics. Poizner wants the state attorney general's office and the FBI to investigate Whitman's campaign consultants.

Torey Van Oot of the Sacramento Bee reports the gory details:

GOP gubernatorial candidate Steve Poizner today said he has reported "threats" made by the Republican rival Meg Whitman's campaign adviser to law enforcement officials.

Poizner said at a press conference that Whitman campaign strategist Mike Murphy issued "crystal-clear" threats to his staff in an attempt to effectively "cancel the election" by pushing him to drop out of the race.

"This is not an attempt to be hardball and to be aggressive, but this is an attempt to effectively manipulate the election process, the integrity of the election process, by issuing these threats behind the scenes to get me not to run," he said.

The campaign provided a copy of an e-mail in which Murphy asks an unidentified Poizner campaign consultant if there is any chance Poizner, who is trailing Whitman in the polls and in campaign funds, will reconsider his run.

The e-mail, provided by the campaign to reporters and in a letter to law enforcement officials, says the Whitman camp can spend $40 million "tearing up Steve if we must."

"I hate the idea of us each spending $20 million beating on the other in the primary, only to have a damaged nominee," Murphy wrote, according to the e-mail.

In the e-mail, Murphy offers that the campaign could "unite the entire party behind Steve right now to build a serious race" for U.S. Senate in 2012.

In a letter sent to the FBI, U.S. Attorneys Office, Fair Political Practices Commission and state Attorney General Jerry Brown, Poizner also claims Murphy told a senior adviser that the campaign would "put (Poizner) through the wood chipper" if he did not drop out of the race.

Poizner evidently believes Murphy -- who often appears as a guest and occasionally fills in for Dennis Miller -- was being literal. If that's so, then Poizner isn't politically smart at all.

Murphy tells his side of the story at the Whitman campaign blog (via Politico's Ben Smith):

It is true that I have been trying to find a way to avoid a costly and unnecessary Republican primary. I believe it is important that Republicans across California unite around Meg Whitman to defeat Jerry Brown in the fall. It is also true that I am not the only one with this view. Many Republican leaders are more and more concerned that the Poizner campaign, now 28+ points behind in the polls and still sinking, is becoming little more than a stalking horse for Jerry Brown and the Democrats, especially since Commissioner Poizner has been loudly threatening to run a multi-million dollar negative campaign against Meg Whitman for months.

Several weeks ago I was advised by a source close to Steve Poizner that his pollster, my old friend Jan van Lohuizen, had been expressing grave doubts about the viability of the faltering Poizner campaign. So I emailed Jan; this is the email the Commissioner is so excited about. About ten days ago I also placed a phone call to a second senior Poizner consultant. We had a nice talk and discussed the option of Poizner considering a race for Senate in 2012. The consultant offered to discuss this with Commissioner Poizner and asked for a number where I could be called back. I do not plan to make any further comment on these discussions, as I do not want to create even more embarrassment for his consultants or get anybody fired.

Judging from the Commissioner's rant today concerning the FBI and Jerry Brown, I take it the Commissioner's answer is "no."

There's more. (Murphy also expresses concern about Poizner's "mental condition.")

This is not good for Poizner, who is, in fact, trailing badly in the polls. No doubt his advisors thought he could portray Whitman as just another vicious pol disguised as a business-savvy outsider in an election year down on "politics as usual." Unfortunately, Poizner comes off as an underdog desperate to get traction. (Hugh Hewitt says much the same.)

It's really too bad, because Whitman is such a lame candidate. Her radio ads are as tedious as they are ubiquitous. She's currently traveling the country to peddle her new book of clichés. After Tom Campbell jumped to the Senate race, I had hoped Poizner would make a stronger showing. Instead, he's imploding. Just as well. If Poizner thinks Whitman is nasty, he wouldn't last five minutes in a stand-up fight with Jerry Brown or the SEIU.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://blog.infinitemonkeysblog.com/?q=trackback/7083

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yo, dude: your name is "Poizner"

(a) scale back your political aspirations accordingly, and

(b) stop taking campaign advice from H. Ross Perot.

.
"Don't confuse political savvy with competence or principles." -- RobbL, 2009

Governator

Hang on, does this mean Schwarzenegger won't be governor any more? Why not?

Also, Murphy misuses the metaphor "stalking horse".

Term Limits

limit Ahnold's tenure.

.
"Don't confuse political savvy with competence or principles." -- RobbL, 2009

Behind Schwarzenegger's desk

Actually, Jay Leno wanted the job. That's California for you.

Term Limits? Leno?

Term limits don't stop anyone with true ambition. Ask Michael Bloomberg.

As for Leno, Arnold would kick his ass. New skit: Jaystomping!

Re: Term Limits?

Term limits are more popular in California than they are in New York City, I guess. Besides, Arnold couldn't be reelected to dog catcher today.

Re: Term Limits?

Oh no, in New York City they went batshit over the term limits. The trouble was the limits are apparently up to some council or other which could suspend them, and they did. If it had been put to a general vote the term limits might have stuck. Then again, the guy did win the election, so maybe not. A lot of people were pissed, though.

Personally I'd vote him in as Mayor for Life, but I admit to being mostly ignorant about New York City politics. I don't get to vote there any more since I'm a New Jersey resident. (I keep saying I'm in New York but that's only approximate.) I wish Bloomie was my mayor, though. He'd get my town shipshape in no time.

Re: Re: Term Limits?

I don't follow the intricacies of NYC politics closely, but I'd be interested to know if there were consequences for any of the city council members who voted to change the law. If I had to bet, I'd say the frenzy passed and nobody paid a price for clearing the way for Bloomberg to run a third term. Also, I understand his challenger was horrible.

Here in California, as you may know, voters passed an initiative in 1990 that imposed term limits on all state and federal elected officials. The part of the law applying to federal officials -- i.e., congressmen and senators -- was challenged in court and ruled unconstitutional. There is a new effort afoot to change the term limits law that would let officials serve their terms in one house, rather than doing six years in the Assembly and then another eight years in the Senate. This is being sold as an improvement, because the limit would be 12 rather than 14 years.

I think term limits are a mistake, personally. All the law has managed to do is empower the unelected bureaucracy.

Re: Term Limits in General

I tend to be against term limits but I don't have a really good reason for it. I can see both sides of the argument. It does tend to empower the bureaucracy because they're the people who know their way around the system. But at the same time do we need permanent fixtures like Ted Kennedy?

Personally I think governors and the like should be drawn from the populace like jurors. No one who wants to run things should be allowed. It should be an onerous detail, like jury duty. "Oh no, I've been elected governor. There goes the next four years. Can I get out of it by dressing like Princess Leia?"

Term limits

Term limits empower lobbyists. THEY never leave, and over time with term limits it leaves them and the unelected bureaucrats as the folks who know which levers to pull and where the bodies are buried. So fresher-faced elected representatives end up relying on them (lobbyists don't just lobby; they often help write bills and generally supply information about particular topics) more than you'd really like.

Let the voters decide who they want to keep and who they want to boot.

RE: Term limits

Having lived in three states with term limits and two without them, I'm fully in the term limits column. Colorado, for instance, has largely been free of the corruption that sadly plagues my home state of North Carolina -- where a state senator first elected in 1968(!) is likely to soon be indicted for extorting his former legal clients. We've sent two Cabinet officials and two congressmen to federal prison over the past decade, and our recently departed governor (another political lifer) received a criminal referral from the state elections board for taking illegal flights and accepting cars from donors. (A federal grand jury handed down a 51-count indictment of his legal counsel a few weeks ago.) Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Besides, what I found refreshing about Colorado, where term limits flourish, is that elected officials can hold widely disparate political ideologies but still work together because they eventually have to return to their communities. I found more thoughtful people from every side of the political spectrum in Colorado than any place I've lived. And I don't think it's the mountain air or the Rocky Mountain water.

Re: Re: Term limits

I think it's the air and the water in Colorado, because that certainly hasn't been our experience here in California.

Maybe it's California

You haven't had the same problems in Arizona, Nevada, Oklahoma, Montana, .... (OK, Louisiana's no paradise either).

Murphy put it in writing

Poizner went all RICO on Whitman - read the FBI letter. He likely has other dirt on her (not all that hard to find if you spend 30 minutes Googling) and may be hoping that an open investigation will catch the Whitman camp doing more serious things. Which I would welcome. I'm sick of thuggery and corruption on both sides.

Re: Murphy put it in writing

I did read the letter. There is nothing in Murphy's e-mail that reads like racketeering or illegal threats to any reasonable person. But politicians looking to make up for extreme deficits in the polls are often not reasonable people. This is, I regret to inform you Anon, standard political operating procedure. I agree, as I mentioned in the post, that Whitman is a poor candidate. I'm aware that she is not popular among eBay sellers. I thought I made clear that I wished Poizner had been better, because the general election is going to be a bloodbath -- figuratively, not literally speaking. Poizner does not look good here. Yesterday's show did not inspire confidence. Sorry.

Poizner, eh

Now there's a conservative. (hahahahaha echoing). No profiling.

First of all, anyone who thinks they can save this state through elective politics is certifiably a candidate for the loonie bin. Appointing a Viceroy makes for more sense.

Re: Poizner, eh

Ay, there's the rub. In California, as in Massachusetts, it's not really a question of who's "conservative." It's who's conservative enough. Often, "conservative enough" means a candidate who gave thousands of dollars to Democrats and liberal causes -- as Whitman and Poizner both have done. I devoutly wish Tom McClintock could win a statewide election here, but you know what they say about wishes and horses...

Wishes and Horses

How's that go? Something like wish in one hand and have a horse shit in the other?

Re: Wishes and Horses

"When you wish for a horse, you will get the poop."

McClintock

... I grok. A Stranger in a strange land. I'd support him in the blink of an eye. What's he up to these days?

Re: McClintock

He is the United States Representative from California's 4th Congressional District, which encompasses the northeastern part of the state, including a tiny part of Sacramento. Here's his campaign web site and his congressional site.

Districts

"California's 4th Congressional District, which encompasses the northeastern part of the state, including a tiny part of Sacramento."

I hate when they do that. My district is the same way. Vast tracks of Eastern CA b/w Fresno and Palm Springs, plus a very tiny part of LA. One of these things is not like the other.

Re: Districts

Gerrymandering in California is a disgrace. Pick a district, any district. One that comes to mind, only because I used to live in it, is the 26th congressional district, represented by Republican David Dreier. The 26th stretches from La Crescenta, where my parents live, through Claremont, where I used to live, all the way to Rancho Cucamonga and up Interstate-15, toward Wrightwood. If I lived two miles to the west, Dreier would be my congressman again. The district covers parts of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. As far as crazy boundaries go, the 26th is hardly the most egregious in the Golden State. (The district map bears an uncanny resemblance to Russia.) But the demographics and interests within the district are so disparate that nobody could really represent them all. By design.

I'm applying for the redistricting committee

Along with a liberal friend of mine from the school. Join us!

CA-25

My district is worse.

Re: CA-25

Yeah, I guessed that's the one you were talking about. Pretty bad.

CA-25 Complain, complain~

C'mon you guys! You know the needs of Eastern Central Californians are pretty much the same as those of Southern Californians!

Re: I'm applying for the redistricting committee...

I thought about that, actually. But I don't think they could afford me.