Registered? Please log in below.
New? Please register.
Here are some reasons why.
I have some problems with Obama's Afghanistan speech tonight, but I think it's important to begin by excerpting a laudable passage that (gasp!) George Bush could have delivered — and often did.
Since the days of Franklin Roosevelt, and the service and sacrifice of our grandparents, our country has borne a special burden in global affairs. We have spilled American blood in many countries on multiple continents. We have spent our revenue to help others rebuild from rubble and develop their own economies. We have joined with others to develop an architecture of institutions — from the United Nations to NATO to the World Bank — that provide for the common security and prosperity of human beings.
We have not always been thanked for these efforts, and we have at times made mistakes. But more than any other nation, the United States of America has underwritten global security for over six decades — a time that, for all its problems, has seen walls come down, markets open, billions lifted from poverty, unparalleled scientific progress, and advancing frontiers of human liberty.
For unlike the great powers of old, we have not sought world domination. Our union was founded in resistance to oppression. We do not seek to occupy other nations. We will not claim another nation’s resources or target other peoples because their faith or ethnicity is different from ours. What we have fought for — and what we continue to fight for — is a better future for our children and grandchildren, and we believe that their lives will be better if other peoples’ children and grandchildren can live in freedom and access opportunity.
Bravo! A welcome declaration from a president who, heretofore, has emphasized America's mistakes and has seemed loath to speak of the triumphs for liberty and unparalleled generosity that preceded his administration. Then again, Obama wasn't speaking tonight before a foreign audience, but a gathering of West Point cadets — about as "domestic" as you can get.
Obama needs to emphasize this point more if he really believes that the Afghanistan project shares this noble context.
Comments
(Sigh.)
This is what Obama told a European audience back in the spring.
I mean, keep pushing that "Obama secretly hates America, especially when he's in Europe" meme. Don't let the fact that the evidence contradicts it stop you.
Context matters
Note all the running down of America in that speech and others he's made on the world stage. Big difference. And I love this part:
In other words, there's no reason for anyone to think America is more exceptional than any other country. Fact is, there's damn good reason for people all over the world to think America is exceptional. And a president shouldn't be reluctant (perhaps a bit embarrassed?) to say so. As a force of good, we have zero real peers among nation-states ... (blah, blah, blah ... as my words are converted into pops and whistles in your ears ...)
Look, Joel. I was praising Obama, as best I can at the moment. And I, unlike some Democrats, will actually root for the Obama surge in Afghanistan to work because choosing between supporting the war prosecution of a president of the other party, and hoping that a defeat is hooked around his neck, it is no contest. Not even close. Call me a Lieberman Republican. When I was a columnist and editorial writer for a Virginia newspaper in the Clinton years, I praised his exercise of military power in Bosnia and (especially) Iraq. If that stuff was online, I'd show it to you.
Declare victory already! At least today. ;-)
(And, no. I was not putting you among those "some Democrats.")
MSNBC's Post-Speech Circular Firing Squad
I share this, only because I find it deliciously funny. From an excellent post by Thomas Donnelly at The Corner.
As Joel outlined earlier, Obama keeping his Afghanistan campaign promise is causing the Pepto Bismol to fly off the shelves in liberal enclaves. Gotta admit it. I'm enjoying that a bit.
Matthews' "enemy camp" comment
This maroon has actually become more outrageous than his Darrell Hammond doppleganger:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTbJcixsLq8
He's beyond parody.
On Matthews
A few years ago I sat in the audience of a PBS style political show ... it was all about Chris Matthews, and the pundit spoke up a storm that day.
My political leanings then aren't what they are today (I've shifted right but was never a full blown leftie) but I remember thinking how smart, logical and reasonable Matthews' presentation appeared.
What ... the heck ... happened to him in the intervening years?
If it's an act, it's an unseemly one. If it's not ... what can you say?
same here
The only reasonable explanation can be that he and NBC are really part of the extreme right wing conspiracy. Anything else is sheer madness.
Post new comment