Behold the "New Politics": Mocking crippled ex-POWs, diving deeper into the filth

The other day Joel wrote: "John McCain is running a dishonorable campaign." That is as may be. I haven't seen the McCain ad hitting Obama for supposedly touting sex-ed for kindergartners, but I'm comfortable with endorsing Ross Douthat's assessment at the Atlantic: "(T)he sex-ed ad... feels more appropriate to a failing, flailing right-wing campaign than a confident, rising conservative ticket."

Lest anyone still labor in the belief Obama is too righteous to descend into the mire, his campaign today released a new ad slamming McCain for being such an old, out-of-touch Luddite that he doesn't even know how to use e-mail.

The ad is the first salvo from the new, really gloves-off, get-tough Obama campaign. You can watch the spot here. Reports the AP: "Our economy wouldn't survive without the Internet, and cyber-security continues to represent one our most serious national security threats," (Obama spokesman David) Pfeiffer said. "It's extraordinary that someone who wants to be our president and our commander in chief doesn't know how to send an e-mail."

Maybe McCain could stand a tutorial on cutting-edge technology issues, but he can sound Web savvy when he needs to. The Obama ad simply and cruelly hits below the belt. Not unlike the Viet Cong. Ahem.

According to a 2000 Boston Globe story on McCain (via Jonah Goldberg):

McCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain's severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. Friends marvel at McCain's encyclopedic knowledge of sports. He's an avid fan - Ted Williams is his hero - but he can't raise his arm above his shoulder to throw a baseball.

Goldberg remarks: "I guess it's an outrage that the blind governor of New York David Patterson doesn't know how to drive a car. After all, transportation issues are pretty important. How dare he serve as governor while being ignorant of what it's like to navigate New York's highways."

We're deep into the filth now. The race is tightening in battleground states. Sarah Palin is not the pushover that Democratic partisans had hoped she would be. It seems more and more likely that this election will be decided on the question of which ticket is less nauseating. I wouldn't presume to make a prediction this far out. We're deep in the filth... and going deeper.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ummm

I guess I'd like to hear from John McCain or his campaign that his war injuries are the reason for his non-use of e-mail, rather than take it on the word of Jonah Goldberg's speculation that it's the case. As hilzoy points out, John McCain has already told us he uses a BlackBerry; McCain's own answer to the e-mail question -- given two months ago -- is that he "never really felt a need to do it." And let's face it: If John McCain didn't use e-mail because of POW injuries, I'm sure we would've heard that from him by now. (And as hilzoy also points out: There are lots of products that allow the disabled to use e-mail.)

In any case, McCain has already said he stands by the sex-ed ad, which is clearly a -- oh let's not soft-peddle this -- lie about Obama's record. Look it up. And I know that you're predisposed to believe bad things about Democrats, and I'm predisposed to believe bad think bad things about the GOP -- but really, do you think the Obama campaign suddenly got so stupid it decided to create certain political backlash by mocking McCain's POW injuries? Do you think it just wanted to throw the election away?

Really?

With respect, you're trying to create an equivalence where there's not one. I'm not naive, and -- to anticipate the argument -- I don't think Barack Obama's the Messiah. Campaigns on both sides stretch the truth all the time. The McCain campaign, however, is lying more often, and more egregiously.

But you know what?

I hate that we're getting into a pissing match about whose lies are bigger, whose campaigning is nastier. I hate, in fact, that we're talking about e-mail -- even if it's my guy who brought it up. Because these things tell us nothing -- except indirectly -- about how each candidate would try to govern, about how they would try to lead America, about what we can hope for from a president. And as smarter people than I have pointed out, winning an election by creating an ugly narrative about the other guy does nothing to help you govern once you get in office. Ask George W. Bush how his Social Security privatization efforts worked out.

I know you're a cynic about the progress of freedom in America, Ben, so maybe you don't care that this is the case. Maybe you're in such an anybody-but-Obama mood that you don't care, really, what John McCain does as president so long as Barack Obama isn't. But there's an element to all of this that seems to play the undecided voters -- the "mushy middle" who will decide this campaign -- as suckers. Maybe they are. I wish, however, that we were better than that.

There's a difference between

There's a difference between a campaign ad ("...and I approved this message") making an assertion and an author dissipating the assertion. In other words, the ad is an official statement of the campaign, but the author's elucidation is not an official statement of any campaign. This is not splitting hairs -- everybody uses this type of discernment every day. For instance, our personal finances are safe because we know how to tell the difference between an official email from our bank and one that claims to really really be from your bank so just click here to verify your account information.

You also committed Gibson's error. In misquoting Palin's statement about prayer -- he didn't start at the beginning -- he inverted its meaning. You just did the same thing to Goldberg. The sentence you're mocking actually starts with "In a similar vein", thus indicating an analogy. He wrote "In a similar vein I guess it's an outrage that the blind governor of New York David Paterson doesn't know how to drive a car", and thus is being satirical about the campaign ad.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
We're sorry we had to do this, but the comment spammers were just out of control. Registered users don't have to ReCAPTCHA.